Saving The Colorado River - Are We Doing Too Little, Too Late?
On Monday, May 24, 2021, I departed Monument Valley for Kanab, Utah, via Page, Arizona. The weather was clear, with only a light breeze. Page, Arizona owes its current existence to the nearby Glen Canyon Dam and its reservoir, inaptly named “Lake Powell”.
Loved by power boaters but decried by environmentalists since its
completion in the mid-1960s, both the dam and the “lake” are
anachronistic constructs of 20th century groupthink. To justify its
initial construction, dam advocates and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
(USBR) had touted the proposed dam as a flood control mechanism.
Later, those running the dam’s electrical
generators switched to promoting its ability to produce electricity
from a supposedly renewable resource. Current lake levels would suggest
otherwise. By 2023, the hydro-power intake structures will stand above
the projected lake level. In other words, the dam will likely create
no hydro-power at all.
As of 2021, drought and structural overdrawing of Colorado River water
supplies have made a mockery of the Glen Canyon Dam and its rapidly
shrinking reservoir. The Upper Colorado River Basin is in such extreme
drought that the prospects of a catastrophic flood are near zero. As
for the power boaters, most of their launch ramps now look like ski
jumps, with a long drop-offs to the rocks below. The lake itself is so
much smaller, snags, unseen sandbars and lack of beaches for camping
make the boating experience more hazardous each year. Shorelines of
quicksand and gravel
bars not seen in over fifty years will consume the unwary. Lake Powell
is fast approaching its all-time low water mark and is unlikely to
rebound in the next decade or two.
In November 2019, the Navajo Generating Station
(NGS) near Page, Arizona ceased operations. If anyone thought that
Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Powell were cynical constructs of 20th century
infrastructure, they should study the development and ultimate demise
of the coal fired NGS. Owned by the Salt River Project, the largest
public utility in the State of Arizona, the main purpose of NGS was to create electricity to pump Colorado River water over five mountain ranges to Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona.
To power the three huge furnaces at NGS, miners extracted and shipped coal from the Black Mesa Complex, near Kayenta, Arizona. Black Mesa lies above what used to be the largest aquifer in the Navajo Nation.
Contemporaneous with the NGS, unscrupulous power brokers had tapped
that aquifer to send a slurry of coal to a now defunct power plant at Laughlin, Nevada.
Peabody Coal and its successor corporations operated the Black Mesa
Mine on contract to the Navajo Nation. In exchange for some transitory
jobs and revenue, the Navajo received a strip-mined mesa and the
despoilment of their precious water resources. As a concession to the
Navajo, the mine offered free coal for home heating each year. Since
many Navajo households have no electricity, the foul and deadly coal
was their only heat source during the winter. To add insult to injury,
the Navajo had to line up with their personal pickup trucks and trailers
to cart off the "free coal".
Although
the mine and the NGS did provide some jobs for Navajo tribal members,
the true legacy of the NGS was polluted groundwater and air throughout
the Four Corners Region. For over forty years, visitors to the nearby Grand Canyon
often looked down on a smokey pit, not the natural wonder they came to
see. At one time, the NGS was the largest producer of airborne
nitrogen oxide in the United States. Only far cheaper electricity
provided by natural gas and renewable sources doomed the NGS.
When Arizona won a larger share of Colorado River water in federal
lawsuits during the 1960s, the largest user of water in Southern
Arizona was agriculture. Pima cotton got its name from Pima County,
where Tucson now boasts a population of over one million residents. In
the days when cotton was king, Phoenix, Arizona had a population of
under 600,000. Today, Greater Phoenix
has a population of 4.485 million. As agriculture subsided, the vast
and thirsty megalopolis of Phoenix/Tucson grew in its place.
A little-known fact about the NGS was its thirst. During its 45-years of
operation, it was the single largest consumer of water from Lake
Powell. It also used over ten percent of its electrical power
generation to transport coal via rail and to pump its cooling water
from Lake Powell. Looking back, the NGS stole water from the Navajos
and wasted that precious water to power itself and its electric trains.
To complete the circle of complicity, Arizona built its current wealth
on the false premise of abundant water, pumped from an unsustainable
water supply. Like a science fiction monster, the NGS laid waste to
water and land while using profligate amounts of energy to power
itself. For 45-years, the NGS wasted water, power and environmental
resources, all in the name of “progress”.
By 2021 and prior to the major delivery cutbacks to come, Arizona had banked about two years of water supply in shallow desert aquifers. Most of it is near the
Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, west of Phoenix. With the water
table so close to the surface, water samples there can register over
80-f degrees. To stave off potential water shortages, construction
crews are installing pumps and delivery systems from those aquifers to
north Phoenix. For as long as that water bank lasts, Phoenix can
continue to pretend that it has an adequate supply of water. When it
becomes obvious that supplies will tighten, expect land values in more
recent suburbs, like Anthem Arizona to experience a major slump in
housing prices. Water may soon become too expensive or scarce to supply
all who want it.
When the reservoir downstream from Lake Powell, which is Lake Meade
reaches its official drought emergency level in August 2021, Arizona
and Nevada will take the deepest cuts in future water deliveries. With
unending drought
and decreased flows in both the Upper Colorado Basin (Lake Powell) and
the Lower Colorado River Basin (Lake Mead), there is no guarantee of
sufficient water in either or both basins to supply basic water needs
to the 40 million people in the Southwest who depend on it. Although
Arizona and Nevada will take the biggest initial cut in water
deliveries, the entire region is likely to experience extreme shortages
in the next decade.
The history of water politics in the West is one of over optimism and
faulty projections. Instead of inaction and dithering as the West dries
up and blows away, both the federal government and the states that
make up the Colorado River Compact should take bold action. Each year, Lake Powell losses up to fifteen percent of its volume to evaporation and percolation into its sandstone basin. The USBR should immediately decommission Lake Powell. They should then conduct a controlled release of water from Lake Powell
into the Colorado River. When that still substantial volume of water
reaches Lake Mead, it will then occupy a smaller geographical
“footprint”. Unlike the substantial percolation at Lake Powell, Lake
Mead’s granite lined basin will retain much more of its received water.
How would these bold moves affect the Colorado River and its water
consumers? First, Page Arizona would decline in population, back to
near its size before construction of the Glen Canyon Dam. Power boaters
would have to travel to a more viable Lake Mead, farther downstream.
As Lake Powell recedes, river runners could once again conduct rafting
tours of the actual Glen Canyon. For the first time in over fifty
years, hardy tourists could visit the most spectacular ecosystem ever
destroyed by a desert reservoir. In time, Glen Canyon would recover,
and the “Eden of the Desert” could well become a greater draw than the transitory “lake”. With luck and realistic planning, Phoenix, Las Vegas and even Los Angeles could survive, albeit on a much tighter water budget.
On the bright side, Page Arizona could become both a rafting and a
mining center, quarrying desert sandstone for use in xeriscape
throughout California, Arizona and Nevada. Personally, I would be happy
to repopulate my Southern California front yard with succulents and
cacti, interspersed among expanses of “Navajo Sandstone”. As I write this in August 2021, my plan sounds harsh. In 2022 and beyond, it may sound like “too little and too late”.
This concludes Part Three of a Five-Part Article. To read Part Four, click HERE. To return to Part One, click HERE
By James McGillis at 01:47 PM | Colorado River | Comments (1) | Link