Desolation Canyon - Wilderness Study Area or Hollywood Back Lot?
According to a recent Deseret News article, “Moab, Utah's scenic and diverse landscapes are an alluring backdrop for movie makers, and now the science- and thrills-based ‘MythBusters’
has picked the Desolation Canyon area to film an upcoming episode.
Officials with the popular show are keeping mum about the ‘myth’ to be
busted or proven — the trick is to tantalize the viewers — but a Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) document details two curious components: duct
tape and bubble wrap”.
The article goes on to say that the upcoming episode will, “showcase
the rugged terrain of the Desolation Canyon Wilderness Study Area and
feature rollicking romps along the Colorado and Green Rivers”. According to the Moab BLM Office, filming will take place in eight locations over ten days. “Strict time limits are set on film or movie permits in wilderness study areas to limit impacts (italics mine) to the environment”,
a spokesperson said. With a purview 1.8 million acres, could the Moab
BLM Office not suggest a less fragile and easily disturbed environment
for filming? With over one hundred commercial film permits issued by
Moab BLM each year, how many authorize shooting within “wilderness
study areas”? Why allow anything but legitimate scientific or
culturally significant filming in such a near-pristine environment?
The Deseret News article went on to say, “Review
of the permits is a necessary function of the BLM's public land
management responsibilities, ensuring that recipients comply with the
appropriate safeguards to minimize (italics mine) disruption of the environment”. The permit for MythBusters signed April 12, 2013 and issued the following week, encompasses activities that "would otherwise already be allowed in a wilderness study area, such as hiking or climbing". In the BLM statement, there is no mention of vehicular support, power requirements or sanitary facilities.
To me, “limiting impacts” and “minimizing disruption” at the Desolation
Canyon Wilderness Study Area is not enough. In support of ersatz
science and commercial profit, BLM should allow no additional
impacts or disruption of the wilderness study area. Wilderness stays
wild only if protected from overuse by humans and their machines.
If
I understand the concept, a professional production team will film
actors as they recreate an experiment for which they already know the
results. To spice it up, they will add some “personal danger”
component. By “saving the day” with their duct tape and bubble wrap the
Discovery Channel will appear to justify filming in a wilderness study
area. If my thesis is close to the truth, the Moab BLM should require
additional environmental safeguards for commercial shooting within any
of its wilderness study areas.
Those safeguards should include aerial video footage focusing on the
shooting locations, both before and after commercial activities. After
completion of filming, BLM should compare the “before and after”
footage, as provided by the permit holder. If there is any substantial
impact or disruption of the environment, the production company should
pay for remediation, replanting or loss of riparian habitat.
While filming the dramatic conclusion to the 1991 film, Thelma & Louise, director Ridley Scott leased a fleet of eleven Grand County, Utah and other official police vehicles. Up on the Shafer Trail, Scott ordered the “lawmen” to chase Thelma & Louise to the edge of a previously untrammeled mesa.
During multiple “takes”, all eleven vehicles chased the actors or
their stand-ins toward their eventual demise over the edge of the
Colorado River Gorge.
Although Thelma & Louise is one of my all-time favorite movies, I
was sad to see that the a total of twelve vehicles and their
forty-eight wheels cut deep grooves into the soft, cryptobiotic soil atop the mesa. When viewed today, either in person or via Google maps,
the mesa is a denude landscape, cut by arroyos and multiple social
roads. Although Thelma & Louise Mesa is an environmental wreck, no
one seems to notice or care.
At
this time, I do not accuse the BLM or MythBusters of anything untoward.
Still, the public has a right to know how our most fragile public
lands are used. As such, it would behoove the producers to rent a
helicopter and document their activities for all to see. If they would
devote more time to environmental preservation and less time to their
“duct tape and bubble wrap” drama, I might tune in and watch their
story on TV.
Since BLM issued the MythBusters film permit in mid-April, all of this
may be a moot. If production schedules are tight, the entire process
may already be over. If there was no aerial-video oversight of this
project, perhaps BLM can add it to their requirements list. Then, next
time they issue a permit for commercial filming in a wilderness study
area, the public will be able to observe the outcome. Until then,
whatever happens in Desolation Canyon stays in Desolation Canyon.
By James McGillis at 06:06 PM | | Comments (0) | Link