It Is Time To Decommission Lake Powell and Glen Canyon Dam
The Lower Colorado River Basin -
The Lower  Colorado River Basin
 begins at the cold, sterile outfall of Glen Canyon Dam.  From that 
point on, the river again receives sediment from various streams  and 
seasonal watercourses. Tributaries such as the Little Colorado River  and  Kanab Creek
 join the river, but provide only a fraction of the sediment that  
enters Lake Powell. Lake Powell loses as much as 5.6% of its volume 
annually to  a combination of  evaporation and seepage into its sandstone basin. As a result, the toxic  load of chemicals, fertilizer
  and heavy metals from upstream is concentrated in the Lower Colorado 
River.  Recently, the U.S. Geological Survey identified raised levels of
 both selenium and mercury  in the Grand Canyon watershed.
Grand Canyon Country -
 After the Civil War, officer and veteran John Wesley Powell explored the length of the Grand Canyon. Attempts to protect the  Grand Canyon
 began early in the twentieth century. In 1906, President  Theodore 
Roosevelt first declared a game preserve there and in 1908, he used the Antiquities Act of 1906
  to create Grand Canyon National Monument. In 1919, three years after 
the  creation of the National Park Service, congress created Grand 
Canyon National  Park. In 1975, the former Marble Canyon National 
Monument, which followed the  Colorado River northeast from the Grand 
Canyon to Lee's Ferry, became part of  Grand Canyon National Park. In 
1956, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) began building of Glen 
Canyon Dam. Until  that time, “more dams in more places” on the Colorado
 River was the rallying cry  of federal land managers.
After the Civil War, officer and veteran John Wesley Powell explored the length of the Grand Canyon. Attempts to protect the  Grand Canyon
 began early in the twentieth century. In 1906, President  Theodore 
Roosevelt first declared a game preserve there and in 1908, he used the Antiquities Act of 1906
  to create Grand Canyon National Monument. In 1919, three years after 
the  creation of the National Park Service, congress created Grand 
Canyon National  Park. In 1975, the former Marble Canyon National 
Monument, which followed the  Colorado River northeast from the Grand 
Canyon to Lee's Ferry, became part of  Grand Canyon National Park. In 
1956, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) began building of Glen 
Canyon Dam. Until  that time, “more dams in more places” on the Colorado
 River was the rallying cry  of federal land managers.
In the early 1960s, the USBR touted plans for Marble Dam  in Marble Canyon, downstream from the Glen Canyon Dam and  Bridge Canyon Dam
 downstream from the Grand Canyon itself. Slowly, the  populace and land
 managers alike realized that the Colorado River could not  support so 
many storage facilities along its watercourse. Even with optimistic  
flow projections, the collection of  proposed
 dams would never be full, let alone  half-full. After the victorious 
building Glen Canyon Dam, promoters of federal  dam projects along the 
Colorado River had to look elsewhere for places to build  their 
socialist make-work projects.
proposed
 dams would never be full, let alone  half-full. After the victorious 
building Glen Canyon Dam, promoters of federal  dam projects along the 
Colorado River had to look elsewhere for places to build  their 
socialist make-work projects.
The original rationale for building Glen Canyon Dam was to help regulate
  periodic flooding within the Lower Colorado River Basin. In that 
regard, Glen  Canyon Dam became a classic case of “overkill”. Not only 
did the dam regulate  water flow in an unnatural manner, it also 
sterilized whatever remaining water  flowed through both Marble and 
Grand Canyons. There were no spring floods to  rearrange and propel 
various sediments downstream. Without periodic recharging  of sediments,
 beaches and shoals disappeared from the watercourse. Without new  
sediments to impede flow, the river scoured away the remaining 
sediments,  including rocks and boulders of immense size. In the end, it
 was as if a slow  motion flood had taken the life out of the river.
 Only
 dissolved solids, such as salts and heavy metals could make it through 
the  sieve that is the mudflats of upper Lake Powell. In recent years, 
regulatory  authorities at Glen Canyon Dam have allowed several  simulated floods
 to recharge the beaches and hollows necessary for a more  diverse 
ecosystem in Marble and Grand Canyons. Even so, most of the sediments  
required to sustain life downstream remain trapped in the methane volcano-fields
  at the upper reaches of Lake Powell. If one were to plan today for the
 least healthy  Lower Colorado River possible, Glen Canyon Dam would be 
an essential aspect of  that plan.
Only
 dissolved solids, such as salts and heavy metals could make it through 
the  sieve that is the mudflats of upper Lake Powell. In recent years, 
regulatory  authorities at Glen Canyon Dam have allowed several  simulated floods
 to recharge the beaches and hollows necessary for a more  diverse 
ecosystem in Marble and Grand Canyons. Even so, most of the sediments  
required to sustain life downstream remain trapped in the methane volcano-fields
  at the upper reaches of Lake Powell. If one were to plan today for the
 least healthy  Lower Colorado River possible, Glen Canyon Dam would be 
an essential aspect of  that plan.
Lake Mead -
Currently, Lake Mead covers approximately 247 square miles, while Lake 
Powell  covers a slightly larger 254 square miles. At Hoover Dam, the 
surrounding  geology includes “K-T Volcanics”, which are mostly 
"Cretaceous and Tertiary  andesitic and basaltic flows". In other words,
 both Hoover Dam and Lake Mead  rest on old, hard rock. Glen Canyon Dam 
resides in and Lake Powell rest upon younger, softer and more permeable 
sandstone. Once water reaches Lake Mead, a bit less than one percent of 
it evaporates annually. 
Comparing Lake Powell and Lake Mead.
 The
 generally accepted figure for annual evaporation at Lake Powell is 
about three percent. Because of its  porous, sandstone shell, Lake 
Powell loses an additional 2.6% of inflow to  seepage. The dry sandstone
 under and around Lake Powell is like an insatiable  sponge, constantly 
drawing water away from the reservoir. If we compare the .09%  
evaporation loss and negligible seepage at Lake Mead to the 5.6% total  
evaporation and  seepage at Lake Powell,
 we find that Lake Mead is 6.2 times more efficient  at preventing 
environmental loss of volume. In the old days, one might call that  a 
differential calculus or maybe even a quantum leap.
The
 generally accepted figure for annual evaporation at Lake Powell is 
about three percent. Because of its  porous, sandstone shell, Lake 
Powell loses an additional 2.6% of inflow to  seepage. The dry sandstone
 under and around Lake Powell is like an insatiable  sponge, constantly 
drawing water away from the reservoir. If we compare the .09%  
evaporation loss and negligible seepage at Lake Mead to the 5.6% total  
evaporation and  seepage at Lake Powell,
 we find that Lake Mead is 6.2 times more efficient  at preventing 
environmental loss of volume. In the old days, one might call that  a 
differential calculus or maybe even a quantum leap.
 If
 the main goal is to preserve and conserve water in both the Upper and 
Lower  Colorado Basins, Lake Mead is the best place to do that. If Lake 
Mead were at  full capacity, it would grow from the present surface area
 of 247 square miles  to a total of 255 square miles, or a positive 
change of 3.2%. In both lakes,  evaporation is largely dependent on 
surface area and insolation. By reducing  Lake Powell to “dead  pool”
 size and increasing Lake Mead to near full capacity, water losses due  
to both evaporation and seepage along the Colorado River would decrease 
 dramatically.
If
 the main goal is to preserve and conserve water in both the Upper and 
Lower  Colorado Basins, Lake Mead is the best place to do that. If Lake 
Mead were at  full capacity, it would grow from the present surface area
 of 247 square miles  to a total of 255 square miles, or a positive 
change of 3.2%. In both lakes,  evaporation is largely dependent on 
surface area and insolation. By reducing  Lake Powell to “dead  pool”
 size and increasing Lake Mead to near full capacity, water losses due  
to both evaporation and seepage along the Colorado River would decrease 
 dramatically.
The Navajo Nation -
As a political and cultural entity, the Navajo Nation has had  a long and difficult relationship with coal. To this day, many Navajo homes burn  coal for both cooking and heat. At  Black Mesa, near Kayenta,
 Arizona, large-scale mining destroyed the  underlying aquifer and left a
 moonscape of physical destruction on the surface.  In recent decades, 
aging coal-fired facilities such as the Four Corners Generating Plant, 
west of Farmington, New Mexico and Navajo Generating Station
  (NGS), near Page, Arizona came under increased scrutiny. As a result, 
the Navajo  Nation doubled down on coal by completing various ownership 
and responsibility agreements designed to  keep the coal fires burning.
Ignoring the health and welfare consequences of an   old energy, coal economy,  the
 Navajo Nation sought to justify its new status  as a gross polluter of 
the environment. To do this, they invoked the sanctity  and necessity of
 jobs in the mining,
  transportation and production of coal-fired energy. In sad 
consanguinity with  Navajo/corporate mining deals of the past, the 
Navajo Nation has accepted ill  health and decreased life expectancy for
 its people. In exchange for a minimal  number of old energy jobs, the 
Navajo Nation continues to degraded the environment of All that Is.
the
 Navajo Nation sought to justify its new status  as a gross polluter of 
the environment. To do this, they invoked the sanctity  and necessity of
 jobs in the mining,
  transportation and production of coal-fired energy. In sad 
consanguinity with  Navajo/corporate mining deals of the past, the 
Navajo Nation has accepted ill  health and decreased life expectancy for
 its people. In exchange for a minimal  number of old energy jobs, the 
Navajo Nation continues to degraded the environment of All that Is.
The Correct Course of Action -
There are advocates for keeping Lake Powell half-full and Lake Mead 
half-full.  In their justifications, they point to Lake Powell tourism, 
payment of long-term  indebtedness,
 loss of power production and water delivery to Page Arizona and NGS as 
primary reasons for maintaining the status quo. They pass off the higher
  seepage and evaporation rates at Lake Powell by saying, “Water 
evaporates – get  over it”.
Scientific studies of evaporation and other storage losses are now under
 peer review. Preliminary findings  indicate that emptying Lake Powell 
to dead pool size and transferring its  contents downstream to Lake Mead
 could save up to one million acre-feet of water  annually. To put that 
into perspective, the City of Los Angeles consumes about  one million 
acre-feet of water annually. That amounts to almost one fourth of 
California's  annual allotment of  Colorado River water.
Lake
 Powell has become a beautiful anachronism in the desert. It is an oasis
  built over a sinkhole, and has failed as an efficient water storage 
scenario.  On the strength of water conservation alone, the U.S. Bureau 
of Reclamation  should decommission Lake Powell. For a  transitional 
period, both NGS and the City of Page,
 Arizona could continue to draw water as  Lake Powell reduces toward 
dead pool size. Over time, Page would likely shrink  economically nearer
 to what it was before exuberant boosters and developers began  
publicizing luxury houseboats and “lake  view estates”. Once again, 
river runners and rafters will develop new  businesses based in Page.
Once we scientifically determine that the Navajo Generating Station is a climate
 change  engine, responsible parties will find alternative, more 
progressive energy  sources for air-conditioning or to pump water around
 the West.  New energy
 technologies will arise to pump Colorado River water over  several 
mountain ranges during its trip to to Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona. If 
Arizona residents and  politicians reject new technologies and logical 
courses of action, they will be  the first and hardest hit of all 
Colorado River stakeholders. In 2015, only an exceptional  monsoon 
season allowed Arizona relief from mandatory reductions in  water 
withdrawals from the Colorado River .
If the people of Arizona support the recombination of two dying 
reservoirs into a single  healthy one, they may avoid future mandatory 
cutbacks and major scale water  rationing. By installing solar and wind 
power near the pumps along the Central  Arizona Project, Arizona could 
reduce or eliminate its reliance on  NGS
 and dirty  coal. Phasing out NGS over a period of ten years should 
allow sufficient time  for installation of new and renewable energy 
sources for vital water pumping  functions. Federal incentives and 
business development investment in Navajoland  should offset any jobs 
now held by Black Mesa black-lung miners and the stokers of the  coal 
fires at NGS.
NGS
 and dirty  coal. Phasing out NGS over a period of ten years should 
allow sufficient time  for installation of new and renewable energy 
sources for vital water pumping  functions. Federal incentives and 
business development investment in Navajoland  should offset any jobs 
now held by Black Mesa black-lung miners and the stokers of the  coal 
fires at NGS. 
Some people say that human activities have no net effect on our world, 
our  environment or our prospects for a sustainable future. Others 
believe that human  activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels 
are the root cause of Climate  Change,
 Global Warming and the looming Sixth Extinction. If that Sixth  
Extinction comes to pass, will we be mere observers or its final living 
 participants? Sixty-five million years hence, some intelligent species 
may come to Earth and study the last remaining fossils of humankind. 
After visiting the petrified mudflats that once were the upper reaches of Lake Powell, imagine the
  scientific conclusions of those future visitors; “They could have 
saved themselves, but did not care  enough about Nature to do so”.
The Benefits of Correct Action -
I almost forgot to mention, if we decommission Glen Canyon Dam, the real and  original Glen Canyon of the Colorado would reappear.  If so, we  can all watch as Mother Nature repairs that Eden in the Desert to its previous  glory. If still living, both John Wesley Powell and Edward Abbey would approve.
This is Part 3 of a three-part article. To begin at Part 1, please click  HERE.  To return to Part 2, please click  HERE.
     
By James McGillis at 12:01 AM | Colorado River | Comments (0) | Link

No comments:
Post a Comment